teensexonline.com
30.5 C
Jammu
Wednesday, September 9, 2026
HomeOpinionDoes Imran Khan Want Erdogan-style Semi-Authoritarian System in Pakistan?

Does Imran Khan Want Erdogan-style Semi-Authoritarian System in Pakistan?

Date:

Related stories

Israeli Airstrikes Escalate in Southern Lebanon

Israel's air force carried out two airstrikes early Monday...

US, Iran Trade Fresh Strikes as Conflict Risks Wider Escalation

Tensions between Iran and the United States continue to...

DAC clears acquisition proposals worth over Rs 1.10 lakh cr for Forces

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) today cleared capital acquisition...

President Murmu hands over Durand Cup to East Bengal FC

President Droupadi Murmu handed over the President’s Cup of...

Amit Shah Outlines Three-Year Roadmap to Make India Drug-Free by 2029

Union Home Minister Amit Shah today outlined a three-year...

After using the democratic system to come to power, it looks like Imran Khan wants to follow the path of his friend-idol Recip Erdogan President of Turkey and move to an authoritarian system.

In a recent interview, Khan expressed open sympathy for the authoritarian system, blamed democracy for Pakistan’s lack of economic progress, and expressed admiration for the dictatorship of Pakistan’s first military dictator, Ayub Khan. Khan also cited China as an example that Pakistan should follow.

What the Prime Minister may have forgotten is that Pakistan is a constitutional democracy, was founded as one, and its people have never supported dictatorships.

As an editorial in Dawn noted, “Pakistan has experienced decade-long continuous rule at least thrice in its history. If continuity was the sole criterion for progress, Pakistan would not have been plagued with governance and underdevelopment issues as it is today. The real problem is lack of political stability often germinating from a lack of political legitimacy. These twin menaces have wreaked havoc on Pakistan’s governance structures and continue to create fault lines in new and unique ways.”

Further, as the Editorial points out: “The tragedy is not that we have a five-year election cycle but that we have been unable to keep up with it. In seven decades if only a handful of governments have been allowed to complete their five-year mandate, then the problem associated with lack of continuity that the prime minister has pointed out lies in the unwillingness of power wielders to let governments complete their five-year cycle.”

Latest stories